(09-21-2018, 08:57 AM)wormsunited Wrote: That solved my issue![]()
![]()
, changing the value to 0 made it work in charm. I wonder why Sentora does not delete the domain names from the table then. This should be working without any issue, as a basic function. Thanks a million for your information, i got my issue solved and marked your reply as solved too. Hope this can help other members of our community.
Did you checked by deleting the entry too? I mean, makes no sense the entry is there...
Best regards!
Yeah, when I first tested it I deleted the entry, and can't see any reason why this would do any harm. But then again, I think Sentora keeps quite a few records and marks them as "deleted" in a similar way to above, rather than removing the record, which again I can't see doing any harm. If you were running some sort of mega corporation and were looking to make your database size smaller then I suppose actually deleting the row rather than marking it as inactive would make sense, but in the real world I can't see this being a problem for most people.
Plus, keeping the record also provides a sort of history - there's a plugin (I think it's called ZGod) which still works with Sentora AFAIK, which allows you to view deleted records (for record-keeping, posterity, accounting, etc.) so keeping the rows and marking them as inactive also makes sense for people accessing historical records in this way.
But I agree, this should be taken care of by whichever script does the domain deletion. Perhaps it was an oversight rather than intentional? I will have a look at the code and see if I can spot where it should be slotted in and then update this thread for those who want this "virtual mailbox" error to go away...!
Keith