I run a test on my server to test its vulnerabilities the score was 90 out of a possible 100 and as you can see it is fairly secure biggest issue open ssl which i will fix this is sentora running
Code:
Server OS:
Windows
Apache version:
2.4.17
PHP version:
5.6.15
PERL version:
5.20.2
MySQL version:
5.5.41
Sentora version:
1.0.0Quote:Score ranges between 0 and 100.
A low score means you are vulnerable to attack.
Score is calculated by the number of high and medium risks vulnerabilities that you have, where high risks are obviously weighed more.
A public server should not have ANY high risk vulnerabilities, since they are clear and immediate danger - plain and simple.
Medium risk vulnerabilities are also important, but here we are willing to "debate" on how critical they really are.
Low risk vulnerabilities are for purists and can safely be ignored unless you are running for the "most secure web server ever" contest. You can have 1,000 low risk vulnerabilities and your score will be "A+", so really - don't worry about it.
That said, if you see any low risks that can be easily fixed (and we are stressing "easily"), fix them. Some day maybe an attack will develop using these seemingly trivial weaknesses.
Code:
Scan Results
Hostname
Scan date 2016-01-27
Scan Status Done
Vulnerability Score
90.00 (B)
Vulnerability Summary
High
0
Medium
1
OpenSSL Running Version Prior to 1.0.2e
Low
23
SMTP Service Cleartext Login Permitted
OpenSSL Version Detection
SMTP Authentication Methods
HTTP Packet Inspection
Supported SSL Ciphers Suites
Identify Unknown Services via GET Requests
Identify Unknown Services via GET Requests
SSL Verification Test
ICMP OS Identification
IMAP Banner
HTTP TRACE Method XSS Vulnerability
HELP Information Gathering
Directory Scanner
Nmap
Nmap
HTTP Server Detection
SMTP Server Detection
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Services
Total 24
Vulnerability by Risk Level Vulnerability by Service Vulnerability Count
(Displays High and Medium risk vulnerabilities)
Security Testing
Type Tests Failed Passed
Infrastructure Tests 12907 31 12876
Blind SQL Injection 224 0 224
SQL Injection 272 0 272
Cross Site Scripting 464 0 464
Source Disclosure 272 0 272
PHP Code Injection 128 0 128
Windows Command Execution 192 0 192
UNIX Command Execution 208 0 208
UNIX File Disclosure 128 0 128
Windows File Disclosure 432 0 432
Directory Disclosure 272 0 272
Remote File Inclusion 16 0 16
HTTP Header Injection 144 0 144
Medium risk vulnerabilities results for:
1. OpenSSL Running Version Prior to 1.0.2e (Medium)
back
Port: https (443/tcp)
Summary:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL:
* The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in ssl/s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a zero p value in an anonymous Diffie-Hellman (DH) ServerKeyExchange message.
* The Montgomery squaring implementation in crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e on the x86_64 platform, as used by the BN_mod_exp function, mishandles carry propagation and produces incorrect output, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive private-key information via an attack against use of a Diffie-Hellman (DH) or Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (DHE) ciphersuite.
* crypto/rsa/rsa_ameth.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an RSA PSS ASN.1 signature that lacks a mask generation function parameter.
* The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCSInstall Docs-ISPconfig or CMS application.
Banner: Server: Apache/2.4.17 (Win32) mod_antiloris/0.6.0 OpenSSL/1.0.2d PHP/5.6.15
Installed version: 1.0.2d
Fixed version: 1.0.2e
Recommended Solution:
Upgrade to OpenSSL version 1.0.2e or newer.
More information: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt, and https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-commits/2015-August/001540.html
CVE: CVE-2015-1794
CVE: CVE-2015-3193
CVE: CVE-2015-3194
CVE: CVE-2015-3195
Test ID: 18638