Sentora - General Security Warning ?

[apinto]

If Sentora had not forked zPanel, at this day you wouldn't even have a Beta release of Sentora, let aside a stable release.
Even, if the new code would be im many ways better, the flaws would still be there and would not have the extensive testing zPanel had.

Now, I do agree that it would be good to have a remade Sentora 2.0, however things take time and let's not give a step bigger than our own legs (crotch over-extension really hurts...).

I'm not saying there are NO security flaws, I'm not a security expert (not even close) but I know how to manage a project, and from what I can tell Sentora is doing the project management in a very good way, trust them, I do.

Back on topic, and speaking from a marketing/management point of view, I believe Sentora 1.1 or 1.2 should be focused on security. Regardless of how many, how little and unimportant Sentora flaws may be for the public it would be a great way to arrive and say with confidence: We are a Secure Panel. Period. Cut for once the roots that link Sentora to zPanel security flaws.

But Me.B you are completly right when you say:
"The most important is offering fixes and solutions in an effective way." (Me.B)

Keep up the good work.